It would be audacious to say Jesus died so that we could have more stuff and better stuff. The man gives up his life and I expect—nearly demand—my flat screen TV, large, HD, brand new. After all, Jesus came to give life, and a life more abundant, right? I’m sure there are some out there preaching that message, but most wouldn’t dare to be quite that blatant.
The prosperity gospel is much more sneaky and subtle than that. And it seeps in even in circles that make an effort to preach against such things.
My little family just finished being homeless for three weeks. In the grand scheme of things, it was a very minor affair—we were very well cared for—but once the third week rolled around it wasn’t feeling so minor anymore.
When the first apartment fell through in the middle of the first week, we were a bit disappointed, but the message came through loud and clear. We felt it, thought it, heard it. “Well, God must have something better.”
The next apartments we visited were perfect. Spacious, convenient, clean, what we were looking for. “This is the reason!” Everyone had told us so, and we believed it ourselves, the first fell through so that we could have something even better.
But those fell through too.
And so the line of reasoning must continue. Something
even better! Though slightly annoying, this was getting exciting. Because sure, we could hold out for just a little longer if it meant God was waiting to
really bless us.
But somewhere between the second and third week, the true response hit us. Someone told us one more time: “God
has to have something really great, just right, in store.” And finally it hit us. No, you know what? No he doesn’t. He might want us to live in a terrible apartment. He might want us to be homeless for all we know. Who are we to presume what he does and doesn’t want to give us?
We had just talked a big talk back home about sacrifice, and here we are presuming the perfect apartment, convenient, comfortable, not too expensive.
Did Jesus Christ come to earth so that we could have the best Parisian apartment? Tres chic? One into which we could put all our pride?
If the son of man is born in a cattle shed and grows up to have no place to lay his head, why are we expecting to be moving on up to a deluxe apartment in the sky?
I only share this because these are the sort of ideas I talk about often, and yet I was believing the prosperity gospel along with so many others. That’s how subtle it can be. Sure, God had a reason for those frustrating weeks, but the reason wasn’t so that we could have our happy ending.
God knows, he’s in control, he has a plan? Yes. For something better? No, not necessarily.
So here we are, in an apartment we find to be more than a little aesthetically displeasing. After our first visit, we may have mourned a little bit, and honestly, described it as a place that would suck the life out of us. Now that we’re here and slowly making it our own, it’s not so bad and there are plenty of perks. Not our first choice, but of course much better than being homeless. Maybe the reason for all this happening was simply to relearn this lesson. A lesson of finding contentment in places other than earthly possessions and worldly comforts.

I was recently told about this piece of art by Banksy. Most reactions I’ve read look at it in light of Christmas/consumerism/materialism, which is probably its intent. But to me it’s a strong critique of the prosperity gospel. Like any good prophet, Banksy holds up the mirror to show us quite frankly what we’re really saying, actually believing, practically living.